A NSW Government website

Guthega skink (Liopholis guthega) - endangered species listing

30 Jun 2017

The Scientific Committee, established by the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (the Act), has made a Final Determination to list the Guthega Skink Liopholis guthega (Donnellan, Hutchinson, Dempsey & Osborne, 2002) as an ENDANGERED SPECIES in Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Act. Listing of Endangered species is provided for by Part 2 of the Act.

NSW Scientific Committee - final determination

The Scientific Committee has found that:

1. The Guthega Skink Liopholis guthega (Donnellan, Hutchinson, Dempsey & Osborne, 2002) (family Scincidae) is described by Cogger (2014) as “Pale grey or fawn above, usually with a pale brown or russet vertebral stripe bordered on either side by dark brown or blackish zones and enclosing a series of small, white, cream or yellow spots. Each of these zones extends on to the upper flanks where each meets a blackish upper lateral zone that extends from the ear to the base of the tail and encloses a series of two or three roughly longitudinal small whitish spots. This zone is bordered by a paler dorso-lateral stripe that may enclose some pale, black-edged spots anteriorly. The lower flanks may also enclose a few small pale spots, but gradually merge into the paler silvery-grey to whitish ventral colour. Usually a narrow, pale subocular stripe along upper lips from snout to, or almost to, ear-opening and narrowing edged above with black. Auricular lobules white or cream. Limbs with a few scattered small white spots. Scales in 35–40 rows at mid-body, the scales smooth with faint striations. Base of tail without enlarged, expanded upper caudals. 4–5 moderate ear lobules. 6–10 supraciliaries. Post-narial groove faint or absent. Head shields regular, unfragmented. Nasals separated. Interparietal usually much narrower than frontal in adults, nearly as wide as frontal in juveniles. Subdigital lamellae 17–20, smooth, single, notched or sometimes divided basally. 95mm (snout-vent), the tail round, tapering and about 125% of snout-vent length.”

2. The Guthega Skink can be distinguished from other Liopholis species by the “presence of a blackish upper lateral stripe usually overlain by two or three roughly longitudinal series of light grey or cream dots. Adults with complex back pattern similar to that of  L. whitii, but with only two colours, a greyish background colour and blackish brown pattern.” It can be further distinguished from  L. montana and  L. whitii by lower numbers of subdigital lamellae (20) and shorter tail (140% SVL) (Donnellan  et al. 2002).

3. The Guthega Skink is endemic to New South Wales (NSW) and Victoria, where it is restricted to the sub-alpine and alpine zones (> 1,500 m a.s.l.). In NSW, the Guthega Skink has only been observed within Kosciuszko National Park (NP) extending from Ramshead Range in the south to Schlinks Pass in the north (NSW Wildlife Atlas 2016; Z. Atkins, unpublished data). In Victoria, the species is found in the Bogong High Plains (Donnellan et al. 2002). The species is listed as Threatened under the Victorian  Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 and as Endangered under the Commonwealth  Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

4. The Guthega Skink is found in a variety of vegetation types, including open Eucalyptus niphophila (Snow Gum) woodland with grassy or shrubby understoreys, dry tussock grassland and tall and short heath (Donnellan  et al. 2002). Areas preferred are usually associated with a substrate of granite boulders or sub-surface boulders hidden beneath decomposing granite soils or thick vegetation (Donnellan  et al. 2002; Green and Osborne 2012). This species constructs burrows in the soft soils beneath shrubs, rocks and logs (Green and Osborne 2012). Soil and snow cover provide important insulation from the winter cold (Donnellan  et al. 2002). The Guthega Skink is an opportunistic forager with a diet primarily consisting of invertebrates and some plant material (Chapple 2005).

5. Little is known about the breeding and social biology of the Guthega Skink. It mates in late spring or early summer and 1–3 live young are born February–March (Z. Atkins, unpublished data; Donnellan et al. 2002). They lives in colonies in deep extensive burrow systems (Donnellan  et al. 2002; Green and Osborne 2012). The similar species  L. whitii lives in stable social groups of 2–6 individuals, consisting mainly of either adult pairs or adult pairs with closely related juveniles (Chapple and Keogh 2006). There are no data on age at first breeding or longevity for the Guthega Skink, however information on closely related species suggests that the Guthega Skink could take 3–4 years to reach sexual maturity and have a lifespan of 8–10 years (Chapple 2003), or potentially up to thirteen years (Bellamy 2006).

6. The home range of the Guthega Skink is unknown, but it is likely to be small as adults seem to have considerable site fidelity with the majority of basking and foraging occurring within close proximity of familiar burrows (Green and Osborne 2012). Other social, burrow dwelling Liopholis species are known to have small home ranges (Chapple and Keogh 2006) and it is likely to be the same for the Guthega Skink. The maximum short-term dispersal distance for the Guthega Skink may be 300 m (Chapple 2003; Atkins  et al. 2015), based on information from the closely related species  L. whitii. Small home ranges and limited capacity for dispersal make this species more vulnerable to habitat disturbances which reduce habitat connectivity and isolate populations.

7. As a result of its narrow altitudinal range and specific habitat requirements, the Guthega Skink has a limited capacity for dispersal (Atkins et al. 2015; Chapple 2003). Most sites occupied by the Guthega Skink are separated by distances that are thought to be beyond the dispersal ability of the species (> 300 m). In addition, the Guthega Skink’s distribution in NSW is fragmented by alpine resort buildings and/or groomed ski slopes, roads and tracks. Hence, populations of the Guthega Skink are considered to be severely fragmented.

8. The total population size of the Guthega Skink in NSW is unknown. No systematic surveys have been undertaken across its distribution (Z. Atkins in litt. June 2016; M. Schroder  in litt. June 2016). However, based on the limited number of locations that have been surveyed, colonies vary in size from two to over 100 individuals, with an average colony size of around 15 animals (Z. Atkins unpublished data). Factors influencing colony size include past disturbance, vegetation composition, soil type, rock availability and aspect (Z. Atkins  in litt. June, 2016).

9. The geographic range of the Guthega Skink in NSW is considered to be highly restricted. Based on known records (NSW Wildlife Atlas 2016; Z. Atkins unpublished data), the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 160 km2 based on a minimum convex polygon enclosing all mapped occurrences of the species, the method of assessment recommended by IUCN (2014). However, as a result of the 2003 fires, the Guthega Skink appears to have been extirpated from several locations (e.g. Smiggin Holes, Schlinks Pass) so it is likely that the EOO is now 119 km2 . Based on all known records for the species in NSW, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 68 km2 based on 2 x 2 km grid cells, the scale recommended for assessing AOO by IUCN (2014). However, if Smiggin Holes and Schlinks Pass are excluded, then the current AOO is estimated to be 60 km2.

10. There are a number of threats to the Guthega Skink including habitat loss and degradation, weeds, wildfire, exotic predators and climate change. In the past, areas of habitat have been destroyed by the establishment and expansion of alpine resort villages and associated infrastructure (e.g. roads, tracks and ski runs). These have also resulted in the fragmentation of habitat. In Kosciuszko NP three of the four alpine ski resorts (Thredbo, Perisher and Charlotte Pass) occur within the distribution of the species and approximately 225.2 ha of potential habitat has been disturbed (M. Schroder in litt. June 2016). Although Guthega Skinks are known to occur within some disturbed localities (e.g. Leichhardt T-Bar), they are absent in areas from which native vegetation has been completely removed and replaced by exotic grasses, such as super-groomed slopes (Sato  et al. 2014b; M. Schroder  in litt. June 2016). Continued development of alpine resorts, including the further modification of ski slopes and plans for an increase in summer based activities such as mountain bike riding, are likely to further degrade habitat (Sato  et al. 2014a; M. Schroder  in litt. June 2016). ‘Clearing of native vegetation’ is listed as a Key Threatening Process under the Act.

11. The habitat of the Guthega Skink has also been degraded by feral horses, deer, pigs and rabbitsin the past, cattle, through soil compaction and erosion, trampling and grazing of vegetation, and the spread of weeds (OEH 2012). The population of Fallow Deer (Dama dama) and feral horses ( Equus caballus) are increasing in the region and they have been detected at higher elevations within Kosciuszko NP (Green and Pickering 2002). Rabbit populations are also increasing around ski resorts and moving into higher elevations (Pickering  et al. 2004). ‘Competition and grazing by the feral European Rabbit,  Oryctolagus cuniculus’, ‘Herbivory and environmental degradation caused by Feral Deer’ and ‘Predation, habitat degradation, competition and disease transmission by Feral Pigs’ are listed as Key Threatening Processes under the Act.

12. Weed species have increased within the alpine and sub-alpine areas of Kosciuszko NP since the 1950s as a result of increased infrastructure development and recreational pursuits (Pickering et al. 2008, Schroder  et al. 2015). In particular, sections of Kosciuszko NP where the Guthega Skink occurs have been invaded by  Hieracium aurantiacum (Orange Hawkweed) and  H. pilosella (Mouse-ear Hawkweed). These species are declared Class 1 Noxious Weeds in NSW (OEH 2012) and have the ability to outcompete native grasslands in sub-alpine areas, suppressing native plant species and creating a monoculture (Williams and Holland 2007; Caldwell and Wright 2014). Transformation of native vegetation into exotic dominated assemblages is likely to reduce the extent of suitable habitat for the Guthega Skink.

13. There is evidence that wildfire is a major threat to the Guthega Skink. Fire impacts upon the species both directly through individual mortality and indirectly through loss and degradation of habitat. Natural fires occur at low frequency in the subalpine and alpine landscape, and post fire regeneration of vegetation is slow in these areas (Williams et al. 2009). In 2003, wildfire burnt large areas of the alpine and subalpine zones of Kosciuszko NP (DECC 2008). Subsequently, the Guthega Skink has not been detected during surveys at previously known locations including Smiggin Holes, Whites River and Schlinks Pass (K. Green and Z. Atkins, unpublished data), although survey effort at the Whites River was low relative to other locations. The isolated nature of populations and the limited dispersal ability of the species suggests that intense and high frequency fires have the potential to eliminate , or reduce the viability of populations and to exacerbate the current fragmentation of habitat. ‘High frequency fire resulting in the disruption of life cycle processes in plants and animals and loss of vegetation structure and composition’ is listed as a Key Threatening Process under the Act.

14. Exotic predators such as Red Foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and feral Cats ( Felis catus) are common in developed alpine areas and may prey on the Guthega Skink, although the magnitude of this threat is currently unknown. ‘Predation by the European Red Fox’ and ‘Predation by the Feral Cat’ are listed as Key Threatening Processes under the Act.

15. Climate change will potentially have a negative impact on species like the Guthega Skink which is specially adapted to a narrow high elevation range of climatic conditions, occurs in isolated and disjunct populations and depends upon specific vegetation structure (Sinervo et al. 2010). As the Guthega Skink occurs on the alpine plateau it has limited scope for uphill migration in response to increasing temperatures and changes to habitat (such as changes in vegetation) which are likely to make sites unsuitable. Changes in vegetation structure resulting from climate change may reduce available habitat for the Guthega Skink. Climate change may also exacerbate threats or potential threats including an increase in the severity and frequency of fire (Flannigan  et al. 2009) and increased risk of invasion of alpine areas by predators, competing animals, disease and weeds (affecting the species through direct mortality or degradation of habitat) (Pickering  et al. 2004; Beaumont  et al. 2009). ‘Anthropogenic Climate Change’ is listed as a Key Threatening Process under the Act.

16. Guthega Skink Liopholis guthega (Donnellan, Hutchinson, Dempsey & Osborne, 2002) is not eligible to be listed as a Critically Endangered species.

17. Guthega Skink Liopholis guthega (Donnellan, Hutchinson, Dempsey & Osborne, 2002) is eligible to be listed as an Endangered species as, in the opinion of the Scientific Committee, it is facing a very high risk of extinction in New South Wales in the near future as determined in accordance with the following criteria as prescribed by the Threatened Species Conservation Regulation 2010:

Clause 7 Restricted geographic distribution and other conditions

The geographic distribution of the species is estimated or inferred to be:

(b) highly restricted,

and either:

(d) a projected or continuing decline is observed, estimated or inferred in either of the key indicators:

(a) an index of abundance appropriate to the taxon, or

(b) the geographic distribution, habitat quality or diversity, or genetic diversity; or

(e) the following conditions apply:
(i) the population or habitat is observed or inferred to be severely fragmented;
(ii) all or nearly all mature individuals are observed or inferred to occur within a small number of populations or locations.

Dr Mark Eldridge
Chairperson
Scientific Committee

Exhibition period: 30/06/17 – 25/08/17 
Proposed Gazettal date: 30/06/017

References:

Atkins Z, Clemann N, Robert KA (2015) Does shelter site aid persistence of a threatened alpine lizard? Assessing Liopholis guthega populations a decade after severe fires in southeastern Australia.  Journal of Herpetology 49, 222–229.

Beaumont LB, Gallagher RV, Downey PO Thuiller W, Leishman MR, Hughes L (2009) Modelling the impact of Hieracium spp. on protected areas in Australia under future climates  Ecography 32, 757–764

Bellamy RL (2006) ‘Life history and chemosensory communication in the social Australian lizard, Egernia whitii.’ PhD thesis, Flinders University, Adelaide.

Caldwell J, Wright G (2014) Orange Hawkweed Control Program Report 2013—14. Office of Environment and Heritage, New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service.

Chapple DG (2003) Ecology, life-history, and behaviour in the Australian scincid genus Egernia, with comments on the evolution of complex sociality in lizards.  Herpetological Monographs 17, 145–180.

Chapple DG (2005) Life history and reproductive ecology of White’s skink, Egernia whitii. Australian Journal of Zoology 53, 353–360.

Chapple DG, Keogh JS (2006) Group structure and stability in social aggregations of White’s Skink Egernia whitii. Ethology 112, 247–257.

Cogger HG (2014) ‘Reptiles and amphibians of Australia.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood, Vic)

Costin AB, Gray M, Totterdell C, Winbush D (2000) ‘Kosciuszko alpine flora.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood, Vic)

DECC (2008) Kosciusko National Park Fire Management Strategy 2008–2013. Department of Environment and Climate Change, Parks and Wildlife Group.

Donnellan SC, Hutchinson MN, Dempsey P, Osborne W (2002) Systematics of the Egernia whitii species group (Lacertilia: Scincidae) in south-eastern Australia.  Australian Journal of Zoology 50, 439–459.

Flannigan MD, Krawchuk MA, deGroot WJ, Wotton BM, Gowman LM (2009) Implications of changing climate for global wildland fire. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 483–507.

Green K, Osborne W (2012) ‘Field guide to wildlife of the Australian snow-country.’ (Reed New Holland: Sydney, Australia)

Green K, Pickering CM (2002) A scenario for mammal and bird diversity in the Australian Snowy Mountains in relation to climate change. In ‘Mountain biodiversity: a global assessment’. (Eds. C Körner, EM Spehn) pp. 241–249. (Parthenon Publishing: London).

Hennessy K, Whetton P, Smith I, Bathols J, Hutchinson M, Staples J. (2003) ‘The impact of climate change on snow conditions in mainland Australia.’ (CSIRO and Australian National University: Canberra)

IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee (2014) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red ListCategories and Criteria. Version 11. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee.

OEH (Office of Environment and Heritage) Atlas of NSW Wildlife BioNet (accessed 20 January 2016).

OEH (Office of Environment and Heritage) (2012) Regional Pest Management Strategy 2012– 17, Southern Ranges Region: a new approach for reducing impacts on native species and park neighbours. Office of Environment and Heritage, Sydney.

Pickering C, Good R, Green K (2004) Potential effects of global warming on the biota of the Australian Alps. Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra.

Pickering C, Hill W, Green K (2008) Vascular plant diversity and climate change in the alpine zone of the Snowy Mountains, Australia. Biodiversity and Conservation 17, 1627–1644.

Sato CF, Schroder M, Green K, Michael DR, Osborne W, Lindenmayer DB (2014a) Managing ski resorts to improve biodiversity conservation: Australian reptiles as a case study. Ecological Management & Restoration 15, 147–154.

Sato CF, Wood JT, Schroder M, Green K, Osborne W, Michael DR, Lindenmayer DB (2014b) An experiment to test key hypotheses of the drivers of reptile distribution in subalpine ski resorts. Journal of Applied Ecology 51, 13–22.

Schroder M, Burgess H, Greville T, McDougall KL (2015) A collaborative approach to the impacts of a changing climate: early detection of emerging weeds in the Australian Alps. Plant Protection Quarterly 30, 93–99.

Sinervo B, Mendez-de-la-Cruz F, Miles DB, Heulin B, Bastiaans E, Villagrán-Santa Cruz M, Lara-Resendiz R, Martínez-Méndez N, Calderón-Espinosa ML, Meza-Lázaro RN, Gadsden H, Avila LJ, Morando M, De la Riva IJ, Sepulveda PV, Rocha CFD, Ibargüengoytía N, Puntriano CA, Massot M, Lepetz V, Oksanen TA, Chapple DG, Bauer AM, Branch WR, Clobert J, Sites JW Jr (2010) Erosion of lizard diversity by climate change and altered thermal niches. Science 328, 894–899.

Williams NSG, Holland KD (2007) The ecology and invasion of hawkweeds (Hieracium species) in Australia.  Plant Protection Quarterly 22, 76–80.

Williams RJ, Wahren CH, Tolsmac AD, Sanecki GM, Papst WA, Myers BA Green, K (2009) Large fires in Australian alpine landscapes: their part in the historical fire regime and their impacts on alpine biodiversity. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 793–808.

Contact us

Threatened Species Scientific Committee

Email: [email protected]